Allowed

Upendra Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Feb 2023CR. MISC./14966/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four petitioners sought anticipatory bail for alleged offences under multiple IPC sections and the Arms Act in a case linked to a land dispute. The High Court directed their release on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners allowed to be released on bail on furnishing personal bond before CJM Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Upendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14966 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-761 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

UPENDRA RAI S/O LATE RAUSHAN RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMIRNAGAR, P.S.- HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI

¶5

AWADH RAI @ AWADH KUMAR SON OF UPENDRA RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMIRNAGAR, P.S.HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICTVAISHALI

¶6

SUBODH RAI @ SUBODH KUMAR SON OF UPENDRA RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIRNAGAR, P.S.- HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI

¶7

AMOD RAI SON OF UPENDRA RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMIRNAGAR, P.S.- HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kahkashan Alam, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶12

7 02-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 761 of 2021 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 307, 385 and 386 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to local politics and land

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14966 of 2022(7) dt.02-02-2023 2/2

¶17

dispute. Further submission is that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 761 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶19

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶20

utkarsh/-

¶21

U T

Upendra Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Girja Prasad @ Girija Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Baboo Singh @ Shyam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar