The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case under Sections 413, 414/34 IPC, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond with sureties.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12005 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-528 Year-2022 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur
======================================================
Raushan Kumar S/O Vijay Kumar Yadav R/V- Jagarnathpur, P.S.- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajiv Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 26-07-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per prosecution case, the petitioner was apprehended on the spot when he assembled to commit any offence and upon search two mobile phones were recovered from his possession.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12005 of 2023(3) dt.26-07-2023 2/2
criminal antecedent. The petitioner has not committed any offence and there is no case lodged by anyone for the recovered mobile phones. Similarly situated co-accuse has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.04.2023. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.09.2022.
Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 528 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
lata/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on regular bail given allegations of false implication and prior bail grants to co-accused.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raushan Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
