Dismissed

Sandip Giri @ Sandeep Giri v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2023CR. MISC./4069/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 8, 20, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Arms Act, the applicant pleaded innocence and challenged police recovery. The High Court rejected the bail prayer due to the commercial quantity charge and antecedents, directing the trial court to conclude the proceedings within one year.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for regular bail stands rejected. Trial directed to conclude within one year.

Sandip Giri @ Sandeep Giri Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4069 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2020 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANDIP GIRI @ SANDEEP GIRI S/O JATASHANKAR GIRI Resident of village- Paharpur Giri Tola, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

6 25-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 349 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 8, 20, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act and sections 25(1b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

¶14

As per FIR, prosecution case relates to recovery of one country made pistol along with one live cartridges and 1.4 kg Charas like narcotic substance from possession of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present case has been lodged.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged arms or narcotic substance (C haras ) which were

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4069 of 2023(6) dt.25-07-2023 2/3

¶17

seized by the police. It is also submitted that there is non compliance of mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.9.20222.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the alleged recovery of narcotic substance ( Charas ) has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and the same is alleged to be 1.4 kg which comes under purview of commercial quantity as per N.D.P.S. Act. According to F.S.L. report annexed with the case diary, it supports the prosecution wherein, Charas is detected which is also known as Hashish. It is also submitted that the petitioner has got six criminal antecedents.

¶19

In pursuance to the direction of this Court, a report with regard to the present stage of trial has been received. The report of learned 1^st Additional District & Sessions Judge-cumN.D.P.S. Act, East Champaran at Motihari dt. 10.7.2023 suggests that trial is expected to be concluded within a period of one year.

¶20

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4069 of 2023(6) dt.25-07-2023 3/3

¶22

stands rejected.

¶23

The trial Court is directed to expected the trial and

¶24

conclude the same within stipulated period of time (one year).

¶25

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶26

Amandeep/-

¶27

U T

Sandip Giri @ Sandeep Giri v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandip Giri @ Sandeep Giri v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aashish Ranjan @ Aashish Kumar @ Ashish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kamini Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Rajbhar @ Baba @ Arbind Rajbhar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kumar @ Ravi Raj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Baidyanth Sahni @ Baijnath Sahni Vs The State of Bihar