The petitioner sought anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in a case involving kidnapping and alleged rape under POCSO Act. The court rejected the bail prayer.
Prayer for anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No.10621 of 2023 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10621 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2022 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan
======================================================
RAJU CHAUHAN@ SANTOSH CHAUHAN S/O Yogendra Chauhan R/O Village- Gosayi Chapra, P.S- Sarai OP, District- Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 25-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10621 of 2023(3) dt.25-07-2023 2/2
petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving kidnapping and alleged offences under POCSO Act?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Raju Chauhan @ Santosh Chauhan
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
