The petitioner raised a contempt petition complaining of non-compliance with an order. Contention for compliance was presented by the opposite party. The petition was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3884 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22311 of 2018
======================================================
Jagdish Kumar Son of Late Krishna Deyal Yadav Resident of Old Post Office Road,Raj Hat,Banmankhi,P.O.-Banmankhi,P.S.Banmankhi, District -Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
===============================================
======= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra (Sc 16)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order, disobedience whereof has been complained of, has stood complied with during the pendency of the present
Patna High Court MJC No.3884 of 2019(4) dt.13-07-2022 2/2
contempt petition.
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as
not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Tiwary/- U
Jagdish Kumar
The State of Bihar
B.N. Mandal University
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
