The High Court of Patna disposed of a miscellaneous appeal challenging an interim order in an online suit (PS No. 236 of 2017). The court directed the lower court to dispose of the matter preferably within one year.
The matter is disposed with a direction to the lower court to take up the matter and dispose of the same within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.1044 of 2018
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Poonam Kumari Gupta ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Parth Gaurav, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Uday Singh, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
14 07-11-2022
The present petition has been filed under Order 41
Rule 11 of the CPC challenging the order dated 1.11.2018 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-1st, Bettiah, West Champaran in P.S. No. 236 of 2017 by which the application filed by the plaintiff/defendant No. 1 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC has been allowed and the petitioners herein have been directed to maintain status quo in the matter.
Learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset submits that he will be contended if the matter is disposed of with a direction for an early disposal of the PS No. 236 of 2017.
Learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 fairly submits that he has no objection if the matter is disposed of within a time frame.
Accordingly, the present M.A. No. 1044 of 2018 is disposed of with a direction to the Court of learned Subordinate
Patna High Court MA No.1044 of 2018(14) dt.07-11-2022 2/2
Judge-1st, Bettiah, West Champaran to take up the matter and dispose of the same preferably within a period of one year.
The aforesaid M.A. No. 1044 of 2018 stands disposed
of.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/Ajay-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Miscellaneous Appeal No.1044 of 2018 challenging the order allowing an application for interim injunction can be disposed of by directing early disposal of the underlying suit.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Kumar
Poonam Kumari Gupta
RAJIV ROY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
