Disposed

Baiju Kumar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2022CWJC/9299/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking compassionate appointment following his mother's death. The court directed the Nagar Parishad to decide the pending application via a reasoned order within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 6 to decide the petitioner's pending compassionate appointment claim by a reasoned order within eight weeks.

Baiju Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9299 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Baiju Kumar Bharti, S/o Shri Rajeshwar Ram Mathiya Zirat, P.S.- Town, Motihari, District- East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Government of Bihar.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Government of Bihar.

¶8

The District Magistrate East Champaran at Motihari.

¶9

Nagar Parishad, Motihari Through its Chief Executive Officer.

¶10

¶11

The Chairman Nagar Parishad, Motihari.

¶12

The Chief Executive Officer Nagar Parishad, Motihari.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Parasmani, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, AC to SC-6 For the Nagar Parishad : Mr. Raghwanand, Advocate ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 25-07-2022 Petitioner’s mother was serving in the respondent-

¶17

Nagar Parishad, Motihari as Safai Karamchai.

¶18

It is the petitioner’s case that his mother passed away on 04.05.2021 and he has made his application for compassionate appointment on 30.05.2022 before the Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Motihari (respondent no. 6). The copy of the representation is Annexure-9.

¶19

The learned counsel for the respondent State as well as learned counsel for the respondent Nagar Parishad have appeared.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.9299 of 2022(4) dt.25-07-2022 2/2

¶21

In view of the limited grievance raised by the petitioner regarding consideration of his application, there is no issue for determination in the instant proceedings and the application need not be kept pending.

¶22

The writ application is disposed of with direction to the respondent no. 6 to take a decision on the petitioner’s pending claim by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶23

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶24

PNM/Shashank-

¶25

Baiju Kumar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baiju Kumar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Devkant Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Captain Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Nandan Kumar Shyamla Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dilip Mali Vs The State of Bihar