Dismissed

Dr. Devkant v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2022CWJC/8834/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a transfer order under which another doctor was assigned to his place. The court held no rule mandates prior notice for transfer and found no legal infirmity in the order, dismissing the writ petition despite the petitioner's grievance.

What did the court decide?

Suit for quashing of the transfer order dismissed. Petitioner directed to pursue representation pending before the superior authority only if applicable, noting the superior authority initiated the tr

Dr. Devkant Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8834 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dr. Devkant, S/o Late Tarkeshwar Prasad, resident of Kagazi Mohalla, Post - Office/P.S.- Siwan, District - Siwan. Presently posted as Medical Officer-incharge at the Offices of Referral Hospital-cum-Primary Health Centre, Bhore, District - Gopalganj

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director-in-Chief, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Executive Director, Bihar State Health Committee, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Regional Additional Director, Health Services, Saran Division, Chapra.

¶11

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Gopalganj, DistrictGopalganj.

¶12

Dr. Khabar Imam, Son of Md. Aslam, resident of near Dr. S.M. Mahila College, Osama Lane, Chapra, District - Saran, posted as Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Uchka Gaon, District- Gopalganj.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Panditjee Pandey, Advocate Mr.Nawnit Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, S.C.-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 22-07-2022 Today being Friday, matters are being taken up

¶16

through virtual mode as per current procedure for hearing.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Counsel.

¶18

The petitioner has assailed the transfer order dated 14.05.2022 issued by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Gopalganj, whereby one person, till further orders, has been asked to assume the charge at Referral Hospital, Bhore. A

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.8834 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 2/3

¶20

copy of the said order, prima facie evident from the order itself, has been marked to the instant petitioner also.

¶21

The petitioner's contention is that he was working at that place where the respondent No.7 has been transferred.

¶22

The submission is that while the petitioner was on leave between 04.05.2022 to 22.05.2022, the said Doctor has been permitted to join in the petitioner’s place.

¶23

On a query being made as to why respondent No.7 could not have been transferred in place of the petitioner, it is submitted that there was no information/notice given to the petitioner regarding the transfer in question.

¶24

Specific query has been made by the Court whether any rule requires any notice prior to any transfer being effected, to which no such rule is shown to this Court requiring issuance of a notice before transferring any person to a particular place. The petitioner thus has not made out any case of violation of any right. Therefore no case is made out for interference with the transfer order dated 14.05.2022.

¶25

The prayer made by the petitioner’s counsel, however, is that the petitioner may be permitted to pursue his representation pending before the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer (Respondent No.6).

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.8834 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 3/3

¶27

On going through the transfer order, it is more than obvious that the same has been made under instructions from the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar.

¶28

In the circumstances, this Court would consider it inappropriate to relegate the petitioner to the Civil Surgeoncum-Chief Medical Officer as the transfer of respondent No.7 in the petitioner’s place is under direction of a superior authority, leaving no scope for consideration by the Civil Surgeon-CumChief Medical Officer.

¶29

Otherwise also, other than the plea of there being no notice of the transfer in question, which has been considered above, there is no legal infirmity pointed out by the petitioner’s counsel in the order of transfer.

¶30

Writ petition is therefore devoid of merit, and dismissed.

¶31

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶32

PNM

¶33

Dr. Devkant v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Devkant v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhairo Nath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Ramkeshwar Prasad Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sarfuddin Ansari @ Sarfuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ranjit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Sukhit Roy Vs The State of Bihar