Petitioners' counsel stated they were under instructions not to press the application. The Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16119 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar- Gp4 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
through virtual mode, as per current procedure for hearing.
Petitioners’ counsel has filed a slip that he is under
instructions not to press this application.
Application is permitted to be withdrawn and
disposed of accordingly.
SUMIT/Shashank- U
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
MAHENDRA PASWAN AND ORS
THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
