Petitioners withdrew their writ application after their grievance was redressed during pendency, leading the Patna High Court to dismiss it.
None; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8106 of 2022
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Shankar Ganguli, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Birju Prasad, GP13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners’ grievance has been redressed during pendency of the writ application and he does not wish to press the same.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8106 of 2022(2) dt.09-09-2022 2/2
Writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shashank/-
U
Sadhna Kumari
Sushmita Raj
Manoj Kumar
Subodh Paswan
Wasiur Rahman
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
