Petitioners in a writ petition stated their grievance was redressed, leading to the withdrawal of the application and its subsequent dismissal by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25061 of 2019
======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.25061 of 2019(3) dt.09-09-2022 2/2
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumod Kumar Shrivastaw, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners’ grievance has been redressed during pendency of the writ application and he does not wish to press the same.
Writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shashank/-
U
Anuradha Kumari and others
The State of Bihar and others
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
