Disposed

Sikandar Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Nov 2022CWJC/660/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Divisional Commissioner to investigate the petitioner's complaint regarding the notification dated 21.07.2022 under the Essential Commodities Act within 30 days and pass a reasoned order within 90 days after hearing stakeholders.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Divisional Commissioner to look into the matter within 30 days of a representation and pass a final reasoned order within 90 days after hearing parties.

Sikandar Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.660 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sikandar Kumar Yadav Son of Shanichar Yadav, resident of Village - Purikh, Ward No. 4, Police Station Bihra, District - Saharsa.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Civil Supply Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

¶8

The Sub-Divisional Officer (Sadar) Saharsa.

¶9

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District Saharsa.

¶10

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Saharsa.

¶11

The Anchal Adhikari Sattar Kataiya, District - Saharsa.

¶12

Ranjan Kumar Jha Son of Dinesh Kumar Jha, resident of Village - Purikh, Ward No. 7, Police Station Bihara, District - Saharsa.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhas Ranjan, Adv. For the State : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For the Resp. No.7 : Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

¶16

Date : 16-11-2022

¶17

We have heard Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, learned

¶18

Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. N.K. Agarwal, learned

¶19

Senior Advocate for the respondent no. 7. The State is represented by Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh.

¶20

In view of the controversy raised by the petitioner

¶21

and in view of the notification dated 21.07.2022 issued by the Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Sections 3

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.660 of 2022 dt.16-11-2022 2/2

¶23

and 5 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Clause-36 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, we direct that in the event of the petitioner making a suitable representation/complaint before the concerned Divisional Commissioner within a period of 30 days, the Divisional Commissioner shall look into the matter and after hearing all the stakeholders, including Respondent No. 7, shall pass a final order within a further period of 90 days, giving reasons in support of the decision taken by him.

¶24

The order so passed by the authority shall be made available to the petitioner as well as the Respondent No. 7.

¶25

With the aforenoted observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶26

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶27

( Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶28

rishi/-

¶29

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	22.11.2022
Transmission Date

Sikandar Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikandar Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Gandak Area Development Vs Central Board of Trustees, Epf through the Assistant Provident Fund

Vinod Kumar Suman, Vs Md. Faisal Ahmad

Chandradeep Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Wazain Uddin Ansari Vs Badri Paswan and Ors.