Letters Patent Appeal where the appellant sought to withdraw the appeal as the impugned order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not admit cross-appellate relief.
Letters Patent Appeal No.358 of 2019 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.358 of 2019
======================================================
Wazain Uddin Ansari, Son of Nasim Uddin Ansari, Secretary cum Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board, Haz Bhawan, P.O.-G.P.O., District-Patna.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Patna High Court L.P.A No.358 of 2019(4) dt.16-11-2022 2/3
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Md. Helal Ahmad, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG-12 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
proposed appellant, in view of the office notes, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal as the order impugned has been passed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against which, an intra-Court
Patna High Court L.P.A No.358 of 2019(4) dt.16-11-2022 3/3
appeal does not lie.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Praveen-II/-
U
Wazain Uddin Ansari
Badri Paswan
Tunni Paswan
Mostt. Kaliya Devi
Ramchandra Paswan
The State of Bihar
Ashutosh Kumar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
