Allowed

Phool Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2022CWJC/6492/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna held that an order passed by the Collector on 19.11.2019 setting aside an earlier selection order was without jurisdiction. Relying on the 2019 Guidelines, the Court found that appeals against District Programme Officer orders became the responsibility of the Divisional Commissioner after 27.05.2019. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 19.11.2019 set aside; petitioner permitted to file appeal before Divisional Commissioner within four weeks; writ application disposed of.

Phool Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6492 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Phool Kumari, Wife of Jai Kumar Ram, Resident of Ward No. 09, Sunderpur, Majhauwan, Bagmajhauan, P.S.-Koilwar, District-Bhojpur at Ara.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate cum Collector, Bhojpur at Ara.

¶8

¶9

The District Programme Officer, Bhojpur, Ara.

¶10

The Child Development Project Officer, Koilwar Block, District-Bhojpur, Ara.

¶11

The Headmaster, Ambika Saran Singh High School, Jamalpur, Bhojpur, Ara.

¶12

Meena Devi, Wife of Ashok Kumar, Resident of Village-Mathurapur, P.S.Koilwar, District-Bhojpur, Ara.

¶13

The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Arun Kumar No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr.Prashant Pratap, G.P.-2 Mr. Lala S.N. Ravi, A.C. to G.P.-2 For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Rishikesh Ojha, Advocate ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶17

8 06-09-2022

¶18

As prayed by the petitioner’s counsel, the Divisional Commissioner, Patna is impleaded as Respondent No.7.

¶19

In view of the provisions contained in Anganwari Sevika/Sahayika Selection Guidelines 2019, applicable with effect from 27.05.2019, thereafter the order of the District Programme Officer dated 19.01.2018 in the pending appeal was required to be considered by the Divisional Commissioner. However, the Collector, Bhojpur, on 19.11.2019 has passed orders against the order of the District Programme Officer dated

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.6492 of 2020(8) dt.06-09-2022

¶21

2/2

¶22

19.01.2018.

¶23

The parties are in agreement that the order dated 19.11.2019 is without jurisdiction since in view of the 2019 Guidelines, after 27.05.2019 appeal against the order of the District Programme Officer was required to be considered by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna.

¶24

The order dated 19.11.2019, admittedly, being without jurisdiction is, therefore, set aside. The petitioner is permitted to file her appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, Patna for availing her remedy, in accordance with law.

¶25

Since the order of the Collector has been set aside as being without jurisdiction during pendency of the instant proceedings, the newly added Respondent No.7-Divisional Commissioner, Patna shall consider the petitioner’s appeal on merits, after hearing the necessary parties, in accordance with law, if the appeal is preferred within four weeks.

¶26

Writ application stands disposed of.

¶27

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶28

PNM

¶29

Phool Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Phool Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sujeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gudiya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kapoora Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jyoti Kumar Verma Vs The State of Bihar

Devanti Devi Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd.