Petitioner filed a writ application. Counsel submitted that the grievance was redressed. The court dismissed the application as infructuous on the same day.
Writ application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.632 of 2020
======================================================
Jyoti Kumar Verma, S/o Late Bhuneshwar Prasad, At present posted as Clerk State Council of Education, Research and Training having his office at Mahendru, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikas Mohan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Abhanjalli, AC to GA-12 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
4 06-09-2022 It is submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed. He therefore does not wish to press this application.
Writ application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM
U
Jyoti Kumar Verma
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
