Remanded

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Nov 2022CWJC/6181/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside the impugned order cancelling the petitioner's license for failure to afford an inquiry report before the decision. The matter was remitted to the licensing authority to issue a fresh notice along with the report and conduct a meaningful enquiry within sixty days.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order cancelling the license was set aside and the matter remitted to the licensing authority to issue a fresh notice along with a copy of the inquiry report within sixty days.

Anil Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6181 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

Anil Kumar Singh

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (Sc4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶8

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

¶9

5 17-11-2022

¶10

A hard copy of the counter-affidavit has been

¶11

filed today in the Court across the Board.

¶12

Let it be taken on record.

¶13

A copy of such affidavit has been handed over to

¶14

the counsel for the petitioner also simultaneously.

¶15

Heard Mr. Dhananjay Nath Tiwari, the learned

¶16

counsel for the appellant and Mr. Alok Ranjan.

¶17

The license of the petitioner has been cancelled

¶18

by the licensing authority who, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, had himself made an inspection of the shop of the petitioner but had not afforded the copy

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.6181 of 2022(5) dt.17-11-2022 2/3

¶20

of the inspection report to him before passing the order.

¶21

The appellate and the revisional authorities have

¶22

sustained the order of cancellation of license.

¶23

The orders impugned in the present petition has been challenged on two counts viz. that in the absence of the inquiry report having been furnished to the petitioner, there could not have been any effective representation on his behalf and that the same authority had inspected the shop and also decided that the petitioner’s license deserves to be cancelled.

¶24

The afore-noted grounds were not dealt with either by the Appellate or the Revisional Authority.

¶25

For the afore-noted reason, we set aside the order impugned; remit it to the licensing authority to give a fresh notice to the petitioner along with a copy of the inquiry report within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. On eliciting the response of the petitioner on such notice by giving him reasonably sufficient time, a final order shall be passed giving reasons in support of the same within the next sixty

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.6181 of 2022(5) dt.17-11-2022 3/3

¶27

days. which order shall be communicated to the petitioner

¶28

forthwith.

¶29

With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ

¶30

petition stands disposed of.

¶31

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶32

( Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶33

Sunilkumar/Mathew

¶34

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikandar Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rameshwar Prasad Mahto @ Ramesvar Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Sayeedi Khatun Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanjee Ram Vs The State of Bihar