A writ petition seeking release of Rs. 11 Lakhs dues for construction work. The Court held the matter was barred by delay and laches, thus dismissing the petition. The jurisdictional issue of justiciability under the relevant Act was also noted as barred by delay.
Petitioner's prayer for release of dues and other reliefs is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.529 of 2022
======================================================
M/s R.K. Construction through its Managing Director, Rajesh Kumar (Male), aged about 59 years, Son of Sri Surender Singh, Resident of Mohalla Babu Saheb Colony, Kabilpur, Laheriasarai, P.S. Bahadurpur, District Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Anjani Kumar (AAG-4)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 21-02-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
“i. A writ in the nature of Mandamus or
any other appropriate writ or order or direction be issued, directing and commanding the respondents concerned to release the petitioner’s dues amounting to Rs. 11 Lakhs against the execution of work namely repair of work of bridge of Kakarghati canal in which
Patna High Court CWJC No.529 of 2022 dt.21-02-2022 2/3
material have been used/consumed for completing the work as recorded by the Site Engineer in the Site Order Book.
ii. A writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction be issued, directing and commanding the respondents concerned to take appropriate action against the erring officials for deliberately harassing the petitioner and causing financial hardships to the petitioner by retaining the amount of Rs. 11 Lakhs and also to pay the interest at the rate of 12% per annum on delayed payment of admitted amount of petitioner from the date of due till the date of realization of the amount.”
iii. Any other writ or order or direction to which the petitioner is found entitled by this Hon’ble Court may kindly be issued.”
The matter pertains to the year 2011/12 and the petitioner has approached this Court only on 23rd of December 2021.
The issue of justiceability of the petitioner’s claim for release of the amount for the work, civil in nature falls within the definition of works contract, as stipulated under the Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008. That apart, we find the present petition to be barred by delay and laches.
As such, the present petition stands dismissed on this ground.
Patna High Court CWJC No.529 of 2022 dt.21-02-2022 3/3
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed
of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
veena/rajiv-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim for release of dues is justiciable under the Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008?
Whether the present petition is barred by delay and laches?
Whether the High Court should have quashed the impugned order due to violation of natural justice?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s R.K. Construction through Rajesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Chief Justice
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
