Oral order permitting withdrawal of writ petition by petitioner who could not comply with court order, reserving respondent's right to legal recourse. All merits left open.
Permission granted to withdraw petition with liberty to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2037 of 2022
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Alok, Advocate Mr. Anant Kumar Sharan, Advocate Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sharan, Advocate Mr. Jayant Kumar Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) =======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.2037 of 2022(3) dt.18-02-2022 2/3
(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/ Hon’ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential ofÏces/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/ofÏces.)
=======================================================
3 18-02-2022 Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):-
Patna High Court CWJC No.2037 of 2022(3) dt.18-02-2022 3/3
Shri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioner is not in a position to comply with the order dated 16th of February, 2022. He, in fact, is able to deposit only a sum of 1 Crore and₹ not 5 Crores. ₹
Be that as it may, Shri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to pursue the remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
Permission granted with liberty as prayed for.
We clarify that it shall be open for the respondent Bank to take recourse to the remedies in accordance with law.
It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. All issues are left open.
The instant petition stands disposed of as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
(S. Kumar, J)
Amrendra/PKP
U
M/s Sonali Auto Private Limited and others
The Union Bank of India and others
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
S. KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
