Writ petition assailing a termination order was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel. The court did not express an opinion on the merits.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 5055 of 2020
======================================================
Dilip Kumar Son of Mahesh Prasad, Resident of Village - Pipra Tola, P.O.Parwa, P.S. Jay Nagar, District Madhubani, PIN- 847226.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
| =============== Appearance : |
==== | =================================== |
|---|---|---|
| For the Petitioner/s | : | N O N E |
| For the Respondent/s =============== |
: ==== |
Mr Ajay Kumar, AC to GP IV =================================== |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 12-10-2022
On account of forgery committed by the petitioner in the process of his selection as Constable, he was terminated under Memo dated 15.10.2016 bearing No 2587/R. The petitioner approached this Court assailing the termination order in CWJC No 16027 of 2017. This Court, vide order dated 16.08.2019, disposed of the petitioner’s writ petition, relevant extract of which reads as follows:
“If in the present case, facts, law and prayer are identical, the order of termination will be treated to have been set aside, but without direction of reinstatement, at the same time, this Court also directs, the enquiry should be conducted and completed without any delay, preferably within three months from the date of receipt or production
Patna High Court CWJC No.5055 of 2020(2) dt.12-10-2022 2/2
of a copy of this order. Any payment will be made subject to final result of the case.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed
of.”
It is submitted by the learned State Counsel that the instant writ petition has again been filed assailing the same order of dismissal.
Petitioner’s counsel is not present.
Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the submission advanced by the learned State Counsel, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Dilip Kumar
The State of Bihar
The Director General-Cum-I.G. of Police, Bihar
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Sahabad Range
The Superintendent of Police Kaimur
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
