Oral order disposing a writ application. The High Court of Judicature at Patna disposed of the writ petition hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, as none appeared for the Union of India or the private employer respondent.
Writ application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3618 of 2020
======================================================
Bageshwar Kumar, S/o Late Ram Naresh Singh, Resident of Mohalla B-231, Birla Colony, P.S. Phulwarisharif, Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bishwa Bijay Kumar, Advocate For the Union of India : None For the State : Mr. Rewti Kant Raman, AC to SC-11 For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Dayanand Singh, Advocate Mr. Nagadeo Choubey, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
learned State Counsel. None appears for the Union of India.
The petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner
would be availing the appropriate remedy since his employer is a private individual.
With liberty, writ application is disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM Raj kishore/-
U
Bageshwar Kumar
The Union of India
The Chairman, National Highway Authority of India
The State of Bihar
The Managing Director, Planning and Infrastructural Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
