The High Court disposed of a writ petition after counsel submitted that alternative remedy lies under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act. Liberty to pursue the matter before Labour Authorities was granted.
Writ petition disposed with liberty to approach Labour Authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 4903 of 2020
======================================================
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== For the Petitioner/s : Mr Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Nayan Nayak, AC to AAG XIII ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
After some argument, it is submitted by the petitioners’ counsel that since the petitioners have availed remedy under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act, they will be pursuing the same before the Labour Authorities.
In view of such submission, writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of on the submission that alternative remedy exists under Section 25 F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Sinha
Aman Kumar Sah
Kumari Babita
Mukesh Kumar Sah
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Katihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
