Dismissed

Madan Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Sept 2022CWJC/3728/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a public interest representation and leave petition challenging the withholding of leave encashment. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate officer of the Corporation for redressal within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Court granted liberty to petitioner to approach Respondent No. 3 for redressal within four weeks, to be disposed of within twelve weeks.

Madan Mishra Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3728 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Madan Mishra Son of Shivpujan Mishra Resident of Village- Patarkha, P.O. Patjirwa, District- West Champaran at present resident of Village- Kalibag, Police Station- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Bihar State Forest Development Corporation Limited Through its Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Development) cum Managing Director.

¶8

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Development) cum Managing Director Bihar State Forest Development Corporation Limited, Officer's Flat no. K-5, New Punaichak, Patna-23

¶9

The Divisional Manager, Minor Forest Product Project, Division, Bhagalpur Bhagalpur

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.R.K.Shukla, Advocate : Mr.Pratyush Pratap Singh,Advocate For the State : Mr.Raghuanand, GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 15-09-2022 The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to pay the amount of leave encashment for 300 days with interest. It is stated that the petitioner retired while working as Forester on 31.01.2016 from the services of Bihar State Forest Development Corporation Limited.

¶13

The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents No. 2 and 3 has submitted that the

¶14

Patna High Court CWJC No.3728 of 2021(2) dt.15-09-2022 2/2

¶15

Finance Department, Government of Bihar, has directed not to disburse any amount to its employees till the final bifurcation of

¶16

the assets and liabilities of the Respondent-Corporation takes

¶17

place, however, he is not averse to the idea of petitioner approaching the Respondent No. 3 for redressal of his grievances.

¶18

Accordingly, the present writ petition

¶19

stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Respondent No. 3 for redressal of his aforesaid grievances and in case, appropriate application is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of within a period of twelve weeks, thereafter.

¶20

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶21

S.Sb/Sonal-

¶22

Madan Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madan Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramashanker Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Devanti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Chaudhary @ Laltu, Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shahid Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Imaran Vs The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary

Asgar Khan Vs The State of Bihar