Criminal Miscellaneous No.9990 of 2022; Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition; permission was accorded and the petition was dismissed accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9990 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2021 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
======================================================
RAHUL CHOUDHARY @ RAHUL KUMAR CHOUDHARY Son of Baidnath Choudhary Resident of Village- Thikahan Matiya, P.S.- Vaishali (Belsar O.P.), District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 25-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Brajesh Kumar/-
U T
Rahul Choudhary @ Rahul Kumar Choudhary
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
