Allowed

Pankaj Kumar Ram @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC24 Mar 2022CR. MISC./9032/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, this High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under sections 341, 323, 498(A) IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within four weeks if arrested, subject to furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within four weeks, furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Pankaj Kumar Ram @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9032 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2018 Thana- LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PANKAJ KUMAR RAM @ PANKAJ KUMAR Son of Ghungharu Ram Resident of Village and P.O.- Madhepur, Purana Bus Stand, Durga Asthan, P.S.- Madhepur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Suman Kumari Wife of Pankaj Kumar Ram @ Pankaj Kumar Resident of Village and P.O.- Madhepur, Purana Bus Stand, Durga Asthan, P.S.Madhepur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

11 24-03-2022 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶15

It is a case of cruelty to the informant due to nonfulfilment of dowry demand by the accused persons.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has not been arrested at the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9032 of 2019(11) dt.24-03-2022 2/2

¶18

spot. He further submits that good sense has been prevailed between the parties and the matter has been compromised and spouse is presently living together.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶20

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Darbhanga in connection with LNMU P.S. Case No. 221 of 2018 (G.R. No. 2924 of 2018), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶23

U T

Pankaj Kumar Ram @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Ram @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhutai Singh @ Nathuni Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Bhulendra Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Malakar Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Vs Thestate of Bihar

Dharam Nath Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar