Petitioner sought permission to withdraw an application due to his arrest during its pendency. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2706 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2019 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad
======================================================
SATYENDRA YADAV S/o Late Laxman Yadav @ Lakshuman Yadav R/o village- Piprahi, P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukul Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 24-03-2022 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
that during pendency of this application, the sole petitioner has been arrested and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma/-
U
Satyendra Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
