Oral order granting permission to withdraw an application as the petitioner had been apprehended by the police during its pendency; application dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9090 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2021 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
MITHU YADAV @ AVINASH KUMAR S/o Parmanand Yadav @ Pramanand Singh R/o village- Barbanna Diwan Tola, P.S.- Raniganj, DistrictAraria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
3 12-10-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as the petitioner has been apprehended by the police during pendency of this application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
shikha/-
U T
Mithu Yadav @ Avinash Kumar
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
