This is an oral order dismissing a criminal miscellaneous application as infructuous because the petitioner died during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27937 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2016 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna
======================================================
SHYAM SUNDAR DUBEY @ SHYAM SUNDER DUBEY S/o Late Pradyuman Dubey @ Late Pradumna Dubey Resident of Barahilen Dakshindwar (South Gate), Jagarnath Mandir, P.S.- Singh Dwar (Sindh Dwar), District- Puri (Odisa)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
3 12-10-2022
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has died during pendency of this application as such this application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
infructuous.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with the application after the petitioner's death during pendency
Shyam Sundar Dubey @ Shyam Sunder Dubey
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
