Dismissed

Rakesh Pradhan @ Rakesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Oct 2022CR. MISC./21066/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's bail application in a dowry death case where charges were framed and the case committed to the Sessions Court. The court held the petitioner would not be enlarged on bail but permitted renewal of the prayer after the informant's examination. (Cr. Misc. 21066 of 2022)

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's prayer for bail was rejected; liberty to renew prayer granted.

Rakesh Pradhan @ Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21066 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-887 Year-2020 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rakesh Pradhan @ Rakesh Kumar Son Of Bashishth Muni Pradhan R/O Mohalla- Jagdeo Nagar, P.S.- Aara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 12-10-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Earlier, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 27.10.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23033 of 2021.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.11.2020.

¶15

In pursuance to the order dated 13.07.2022, status report of trial in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 887 of 2020 has been received and kept at Flag-R, in which it is

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21066 of 2022(5) dt.12-10-2022 2/2

¶17

reported that charge has been framed and case is committed to the court of Sessions within one month.

¶18

Considering the present stage of the trial, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his payer for bail is rejected in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 887 of 2020 pending before the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistate, Ara.

¶19

Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

¶20

However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant in the trial.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

devendra/-

Rakesh Pradhan @ Rakesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Pradhan @ Rakesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manna Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vishnu Dayal @ Vishnu Dayal Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Gurudev Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Mithu Yadav @ Avinash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sundar Dubey @ Shyam Sunder Dubey Vs The State of Bihar