An application by petitioners seeking to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition through video conferencing was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal guidance was provided.
Permission to withdraw the application through video conferencing was allowed. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71728 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
2 07-02-2022 The defect(s), if any, be removed within one week of
starting of the Court proceeding in physical mode properly.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application through video conferencing.
Prayer is allowed.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Shamshad/-
U T
Shiv Shankar Pandey and Anr.
The State of Bihar and Nidi Pandey
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
