Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR under Sections 307 and 302 IPC. The court noted custodial investigation is required and refused anticipatory bail, dismissing the application.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61839 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2019 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
No one appears for the petitioners. The FIR is registered against the petitioners under Sections 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Custodial investigation is required in such matters. No case for anticipatory bail is made out.
Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Anand Kr.
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners accused of offences under Sections 307 and 302 IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Anup Sah @ Anup Kumar @ Anubh Kumar
Aman Kumar @ Aman Sah
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
