Partly allowed

Suraj Narayan Mandal @ Suraj Narayan Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2022CR. MISC./69966/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single handed bail application rejecting bail for accused Rajnish Singh due to heavy liquor recovery while granting bail to two other co-accused Suraj Narayan Mandal and Jogendra Kamat possessing no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to Suraj Narayan Mandal and Jogendra Kamat bond amount Rs.10,000 each with two sureties. Bail rejected for Rajnish Singh allowed to renew prayer after one year.

Suraj Narayan Mandal @ Suraj Narayan Mahto Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66075 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2021 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJNISH SINGH @ MUNNA SINGH SON OF LATE HARISH CHANDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BISHANPUR, P.SBENIPATTI, DIST- MADHUBANI, BIHAR

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with

¶11

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69966 of 2021

¶12

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2021 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani

¶13

======================================================

¶14

SURAJ NARAYAN MANDAL @ SURAJ NARAYAN MAHTO S/o Late Khakhan Mahto Resident of Agrepatti, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani

¶15

JOGENDRA KAMAT S/O KAPILESHWAR KAMAT R/o villageDhankaul, P.S.- Jale, District- Darbhanga

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶20

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66075 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Preety Kunwar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 69966 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

2 26-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

The petitioners have preferred this application for

¶24

grant of regular bail in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case no.217 of 2021 registered under sections 272, 273 and 120B of

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66075 of 2021(2) dt.26-04-2022 2/3

¶26

the Indian Penal Code and sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶27

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner Rajnish Singh was arrested at the spot and 649.125 litres of liquor was recovered from his Bolero vehicle. It is also stated in the F.I.R. that seeing the police personnel, about 10-15 accused persons made an attempt to escape. Four of the accused including Suraj Narayan Mandal and Jogendra Kamat were arrested and 0.75 litres of liquor was recovered from their possession.

¶28

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, no incriminating article has been recovered from their possession and they are in custody since 1.10.2021, 18.10.2021 and 18.10.2021 respectively.

¶29

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶30

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, recovery of 649.125 litres of liquor from the Bolero vehicle of the petitioner Rajnish Singh together with him having been arrested at the spot, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner Rajnish Singh on bail and the application is rejected.

¶31

Liberty is granted to the petitioner Rajnish Singh to

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66075 of 2021(2) dt.26-04-2022 3/3

¶33

renew his prayer for bail on completing one year in custody.

¶34

In the facts and circumstances of the case specially the petitioners Suraj Narayan Mandal @ Suraj Narayan Mahto and Jogendra Kamat not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs both these petitioners to be enlarged on bail in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case no.217 of 2021 (G.R. no.1814 of 2021) on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani.

¶35

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶36

Saurabh/-

¶37

U T

Suraj Narayan Mandal @ Suraj Narayan Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Narayan Mandal @ Suraj Narayan Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sachin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar