Allowed

Sanjay Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2022CR. MISC./49214/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for regular bail under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the High Court at Patna enlarged the petitioner on bail after noting his 10-month custody without spot arrest and recovery of incriminating articles from his possession.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49214 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2020 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY SAH Son of Baidyanath Sah Resident of Moti Chhapra, P.S.- Paroo, District - Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶13

of regular bail in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, it is stated that on information having been received, a raid was conducted. While the accused persons managed to escape, amongst the accused the petitioner was identified by the Chowkidar. A total of 3453.865 litres of IMFL was recovered.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 16.6.2021 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. It is submitted that an affidavit has been filed online enclosing

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49214 of 2021(6) dt.25-04-2022 2/2

¶17

with the same copy of the receipt of deposit of cost of Rs.5000/ as directed by this Court.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner having remained in custody for 10 months and not having been arrest at the spot, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Paroo P.S. Case no. 231 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Bibhash/-

¶22

Sanjay Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Singh @ Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajaram Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Patel @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Bansh Singh @ Harivansh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar