Dismissed

Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2022CR. MISC./61679/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for regular bail under sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the court denied bail due to recovery of liquor and the petitioner's antecedents, allowing renewal after one year.

What did the court decide?

The application for regular bail is rejected. Liberty to renew the prayer after completion of one year in custody is granted.

Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61679 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2019 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KANHAIYA SINGH @ KANHAIYA KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Ram Dinesh Singh Resident of Village- Ratanman, Babhangama, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 25-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, 16.5 litres of liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner in presence of his uncle Markandey Singh. The petitioner managed to escape.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedents. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession or his house. He is in custody since 7.8.2021.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61679 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 2/2

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, recovery of 16.5 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner in presence of his uncle together with the antecedent of the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

¶18

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail on completing one year in custody.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

Bibhash/-

¶21

Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Singh @ Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajaram Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Patel @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Bansh Singh @ Harivansh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar