Allowed

Siddu Kumar @ Suddu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Dec 2022CR. MISC./63339/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, the High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a case relating to illegal liquor manufacturing. The court noted that the recovered liquor was not in the petitioner's conscious possession and the chargesheet was already submitted. Bail was granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the like amount.

Siddu Kumar @ Suddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63339 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-756 Year-2022 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Siddu Kumar @ Suddu Kumar S/O Vijay Ray Resident of village- Mandahi, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 23-12-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶13

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 756 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶15

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 19.08.2022.

¶16

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 40 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the alleged vehicle.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made from

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63339 of 2022(3) dt.23-12-2022 2/2

¶19

motorcycle parked in abundant condition near to Gomti river bridge, which is not connected in any manner with this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶20

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery of alleged illicit liquor not appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 756 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, Bhojpur, Ara/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶23

pooja/-

¶24

U T

Siddu Kumar @ Suddu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddu Kumar @ Suddu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Pandey @ Prakash Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Savita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar