Allowed

Prakash Pandey @ Prakash Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Dec 2022CR. MISC./39275/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order confirms provisional bail granted to the petitioner in a cheque dishonour case. The court directs the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2,000 monthly to the petitioner's wife as a condition for bail, with cancellation of the bond for failure to pay for two consecutive months. Mediation was unsuccessful.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail confirmed by directing payment of Rs. 2,000 monthly to the wife.

Prakash Pandey @ Prakash Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39275 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2022 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prakash Pandey @ Prakash Kumar Pandey Son Of Late Mundrika Pandey R/O Mohalla- Shekpura, Sherghati, Ward No.-15, P.S.- Sherghati, DistrictGaya (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kumari Sunita Mishra Wife Of Prakash Kumar Pandey, D/O Sri Saryu Mishra R/O Mohalla- Mishra Tola, Buchi Dadhi, P.S.- Chatra, DistrictChatra

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prakash Pandey, APP : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 22-12-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

¶13

On perusal of Mediation Report it appears that the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and, as such mediation was failed.

¶14

However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted that he is ready to pay Rs.2,000 (Rupees Two Thousand) per month to O.P. No.2/wife, namely Kumari Sunita Mishra.

¶15

Learned APP appearing on behalf of State, opposes the prayer for bail.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39275 of 2022(5) dt.22-12-2022 2/2

¶17

Considering the submissions as made above, provisional bail granted to this petitioner vide order dated 30.09.2022 is hereby confirmed with same bail bond and sureties, subject to following conditions:

¶18

(i) Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.2,000 (Rupees Two Thousand), in the given bank account of O.P. No.2/wife, positively, on or before seventh day of every english calendar month and on failing for two consecutive months, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled by the learned Trial Court, itself.

¶19

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶20

S.Tripathi/-

¶21

U T

Prakash Pandey @ Prakash Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Pandey @ Prakash Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Faiyaz Alam @ Chotu Vs The State of Bihar

Kadir Miyan @ Kadir Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Yadav @ Kranti Yadav @ Kranti Vs the State of Bihar

Laddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ankajyadav Vs The State of Bihar