Dismissed

Kundan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jan 2022CR. MISC./58371/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous appeal for bail arising from a murder case, the Patna High Court refused to grant bail to the petitioner who was already in custody. The court held that directed allegations against the petitioner warranted denial of liberty and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within one year.

What did the court decide?

Bail petition rejected; trial directed to be concluded within one year.

Kundan Thakur Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58371 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2020 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KUNDAN THAKUR Son of Fudena Thakur Resident of Village - Bulachak, P.S.- Chakia, Distt.- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar. ... .. opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Priyesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

¶10

4 12-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the State.

¶12

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Petitioner had earlier moved this Court for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 5644 of 2021 which was rejected on 12.04.2021.

¶14

Informant is a widow of deceased, who has alleged in her FIR that on 23.05.2020 at about 9:00 P.M., she was in her

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58371 of 2021(4) dt.12-01-2022 2/3

¶16

house along with her family and her husband, when FIR named accused Sabitesh Singh, Harendra Rai and Kundan Thakur came on two motorcycles and asked her husband to accompany them and thereafter her husband went with them on his motorcycle but when he did not return then his father-in-law and brother-in-law went to search him and it is alleged that three FIR named accused caught hold the deceased and allegation against petitioner Kundan Thakur is to have fired upon him as a result of which, he died.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and no motive has been assigned for murdering the husband of informant. It has come during investigation that there was dispute between Sabitesh Kumar and deceased with respect to refund of Rs. 2 lacs and that is stated to be cause of murder.

¶18

As there is directed allegation against the petitioner of having fired upon the deceased, causing his death, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly bail petition is rejected.

¶19

It is further stated that charges has already been framed against the petitioner in the month of September, 2021 as such trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58371 of 2021(4) dt.12-01-2022 3/3

¶21

within one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of

¶22

order passed by this court.

¶23

(S. Kumar, J)

¶24

Rajiv/veena-

¶25

Kundan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamun Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Sapna Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Babbu Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Satya Prakash Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar