Sapna Kumari v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the hearing date despite previous non-appearances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9092 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad
======================================================
SAPNA KUMARI D/O- Shiv Shankar Prasad Resident of Village - Bihargain, P.O.- Bhaduhar, P.S.- Raushanganj, District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anirudh Pandey, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, however,
learned counsel for the State is present.
On earlier occasion also i.e. on 06.10.2021 and
17.11.2021, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed for non
prosecution.
(S. Kumar, J)
ranjan/-
U
Sapna Kumari
The State of Bihar
Vivek Kumar
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court