Allowed

Mahendra Rajbanshi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Dec 2022CR. MISC./54895/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a regular bail application for petitioners in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. Considering the custody period, a land dispute, and the nature of injuries, the court released the petitioners on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioners released on maintaining a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 by each with two sureties of the same amount.

Mahendra Rajbanshi Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54895 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2021 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahendra Rajbanshi, don of Rajo Rajbanshi.

¶5

Rajo Rajbanshi, Son of Vihaspati Rajbanshi, Resident of Village - Nawadih, Manjhauli, P.S.- Sirdala, Distt.- Nawada.

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP For the Informant : Ms. Kanchan Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party

¶10

2 23-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶12

This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Sirdala P.S. Case No.347 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The petitioners are in custody since 22.05.2022.

¶14

Considering the fact that the petitioners and the prosecution side have land dispute, considering the nature of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54895 of 2022(2) dt.23-12-2022 2/2

¶16

injury sustained by the injured and also the period of custody of the petitioners inasmuch as, there is case and counter case between the parties, this regular bail application is allowed.

¶17

Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Nawada, in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No.347 of 2021.

¶18

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶19

pawan/-

¶20

U T

Mahendra Rajbanshi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Rajbanshi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Krishna Nand Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Kumar Chaubey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bilash Mandal @ Ram Bilash Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Jyoti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar