Petitioner reported that an earlier order was complied with, resulting in redressal of grievance. The Court disposed of the writ petition without substantive examination of facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5614 of 2021
======================================================
Krishna Nand Singh S/o Late Sudhir Prasad Singh R/o Village and P.O.Orabagicha, P.S. Dharhara, District-Munger, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Dayanand Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.Dhurjati Kr. Prasad, GP 14
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 22-12-2022 Heard the parties.
At the very outset, Mr. Dayanand Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court has been complied and now the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
In this view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed
of.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
BT/-
U
Krishna Nand Singh
State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Gov. of BIhar
District Collector, Munger
Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Munger
Circle Officer, Dharhara
Superintendent of Police, Munger
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
