The Patna High Court heard a bail application under Section 395 IPC where the petitioner was accused of snatching. The court denied bail citing the petitioner's prior involvement in similar activities and directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.
Bail rejected; trial directed to be concluded expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52111 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2019 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur
======================================================
Naveen Kumar Sah @ Naveen Kumar S/o Nathuni Sah R/o village- Fakirana, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kuma, APPr ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 07-04-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No.165 of 2019 was
registered on 05.03.2019 under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, while returning home the informant was intercepted by unknown persons and his motorcycle, mobile and the wallet containing Rs.3000/- were snatched.
The truncated para-3 which later has been supplemented with a supplementary affidavit (and is being kept on record) shows that he has taken part in such activities earlier too.
In this circumstance this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner, which is accordingly rejected.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52111 of 2021(3) dt.07-04-2022 2/2
The Trial court is directed to conclude the trial
expeditiously.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Prakash Narayan /- U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail given his prior involvement in similar activities.
Whether the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial expeditiously after bail is rejected.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naveen Kumar Sah
The State Of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
