Allowed

Jandan Das @ Yadunandan Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Apr 2022CR. MISC./5086/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was accused of involvement in a case regarding the recovery of illicit liquor. The bail was subject to verification of the petitioner's antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, subject to antecedent verification.

Jandan Das @ Yadunandan Das Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5086 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2021 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JANDAN DAS @ YADUNANDAN DAS SON OF SAMFUL DAS R/O VILLAGE- MOHANPUR, P.S.- MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No.2, Adv. Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-04-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶13

of regular bail in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, 1053 litres of IMFL was recovered from the vehicle being driven by the petitioner.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession or from the vehicle in question. He is in custody since 2.6.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5086 of 2022(2) dt.18-04-2022 2/2

¶19

taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case no.124 of 2021 (CIS no.945 of 2021) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya.

¶20

It is directed that the learned trial court will get the antecedent of the petitioner verified from the local police station as also from the Superintendent of Police concerned and in case it transpires that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and he shall be taken into custody.

¶21

It is clarified that awaiting the receipt of the report with respect to antecedent of the petitioner, the release of the petitioner pursuant to the instant order granting bail shall not be delayed. The petitioner shall not be detained in custody but shall be released forthwith.

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶23

Saurabh/- U T

Jandan Das @ Yadunandan Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jandan Das @ Yadunandan Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Shukla @ Pappu Shukla Vs The State of Bihar

Vipin Mahto @ Jhingwa Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar @ Prem Kumar Vs The State of bihar