Allowed

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Apr 2022CR. MISC./3557/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the Court, considering the recovery of liquor from an orchard and the submission of the chargesheet, enlarged the petitioner on bail upon execution of a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on execution of a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3557 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-592 Year-2021 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SURAJ KUMAR S/o Pannalal Mandal Resident of Village- Marar, P.S.Morkahi, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : M/s Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-04-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video

¶13

conferencing.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶15

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner who made an attempt to escape was caught and it is stated that 22 litres of IMFL was recovered from the orchard.

¶17

It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedents. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 29.7.2021 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 3557 of 2022(2) dt.15-04-2022 2/2

¶19

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the place from which the liquor was recovered being an orchard together with chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case no. 592 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Excise), Khagaria.

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶22

Spd/-

¶23

U T

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Paswan @ Binod Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Sinha @ Amit Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Shukla @ Pappu Shukla Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Rai @ Binod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar