Allowed

Shailendra Shukla @ Pappu Shukla v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Apr 2022CR. MISC./11779/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, owner of a brick kiln, in a case involving illegal manufacturing and sale of IMFL under IPC sections 272, 273 and the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioners had no criminal antecedents and were directed to furnish a bail bond with sureties to an Excise Judge.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge II – cum – Special Judge, E

Shailendra Shukla @ Pappu Shukla Vs The State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11779 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2019 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHAILENDRA SHUKLA @ PAPPU SHUKLA Son of Radha Raman Shukla Resident of Village- Vrindaban, Police Station- Uchkagaon, DistrictGopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 15-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, 457.92 litres of IMFL was recovered from brick kiln and the owner and the clerk (petitioner ) of the said brick kiln were made accused.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered as alleged in the FIR. The owner of the brick kiln has been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 27.11.2019 (Annxure-2)

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11779 of 2022(2) dt.15-04-2022 2/2

¶18

passed in Cr. Misc. no. 65778 of 2019. The petitioner is in custody since 19.1.2022 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶19

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case no. 170 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II – cum – Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj.

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶22

Spd/-

¶23

U T

Shailendra Shukla @ Pappu Shukla v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Shukla @ Pappu Shukla v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Paswan @ Binod Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Sinha @ Amit Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Rai @ Binod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar