The petitioner, facing an anticipatory bail petition which became infructuous due to his arrest, sought permission to withdraw. The court allowed the withdrawal and acknowledged directives to remove petition defects.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner directed to remove defects within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4761 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2021 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda
======================================================
SUMAN SAURABH Son of Gopali Prasad, Resident of Village - Dangi Tola, P.s.- Rajgir, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Griyaghey For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Rina Sinha ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of this anticipatory bail petition, the petitioner has been arrested and, as such, it has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this petitoin is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U T
Suman Saurabh
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
