Allowed

Md. Mujjamil v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Aug 2022CR. MISC./4648/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of assault and criminal conspiracy. The court directed the removal of stamp defects and granted bail subject to sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to the removal of stamp defects within one month.

Md. Mujjamil Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4648 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2021 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. MUJJAMIL SON OF LATE MD. SULTAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMPUR, BASWAN, P.S.- MATIHANI, DISTRICTBEGUSARAI

¶5

MD MODASSER @ MD MUDASSER SON OF LATE MD. SULTAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMPUR, BASWAN, P.S.- MATIHANI, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 12-08-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 323, 307, 341, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Matihani P.S.Case No. 101 of 2021.

¶14

Specific allegation against petitioner no.1 is that he assaulted the sister-in-law of the informant by iron rod and allegation against petitioner no.2 is that he assaulted the informant with lathi on his head.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that they are persons of clean antecedent and the injuries

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4648 of 2022(2) dt.12-08-2022 2/2

¶17

suffered by the informant are simple in nature. He has submitted further that both the parties are relatives.

¶18

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S.Case No. 101 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶19

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶20

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

HR/-

¶22

U T

Md. Mujjamil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Mujjamil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Rai @ Raju Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Priti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Gulshan Ray @ Gulshan Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Saurabh Vs The State of Bihar

Madan Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar Vs the State of Bihar