Allowed

Mithu Dome v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Nov 2022CR. MISC./46695/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Mithu Dome, in a theft case involving offences underSections 457, 380, and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, directing release on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

Mithu Dome Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46695 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-766 Year-2021 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithu Dome, aged about 26 years, male, Son of Prakash Harijan, R/o Mohalla- Housing Board Mushari, P.S.- Barari, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakritita Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-11-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

¶13

Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 766 of 2021, dated 11.11.2021, instituted for the offences under Sections

¶14

457, 380, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

A theft was committed in the house of the brother-in-law of the informant. One of the miscreants, namely, Ram Roop Yadav, was arrested. The name of

¶16

the petitioner has been disclosed by the local persons

¶17

and not by the person who was arrested on the spot.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46695 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 2/2

¶19

Hence, the prosecution against him.

¶20

There has been no recovery from the petitioner

¶21

and he has no criminal antecedents.

¶22

The petitioner is said to be in custody since 12.04.2022.

¶23

Considering the facts afore-stated, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali

¶24

(Barari) P.S. Case No. 766 of 2021.

¶25

The application stands allowed.

¶26

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶27

Praveen-II/-

¶28

U T

Mithu Dome v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithu Dome v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md.Ajim Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjeet Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Baudha Singh @ Baudha Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Prasad Sah Vs the State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna, Bihar

Pappu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Imran Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar