Allowed

Pappu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Nov 2022CR. MISC./46526/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted to Pappu Kumar in a case involving offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The petition alleged false accusations. The petitioner was to be released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail in connection with Special Case No. 140 of 2020 upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Pappu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46526 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-388 Year-2020 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pappu Kumar Son of Jitendra Rai @ Jitendra Prasad R/O Village- Ramcharan Chhatni, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 25-11-2022 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, learned Advocate for

¶14

the petitioner/s and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner, who is in custody since 09.03.2022, seeks bail in connection with Special Case No. 140 of 2020 arising out of Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 388 of 2020 dated 26.07.2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8/12 of the POCSO Act.

¶16

The petitioner and one Mantu Kumar are alleged to have entered into the house of the Informant and attempted to outrage the modesty of the two minor daughters.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an absolutely false accusation has been hurled against the petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46526 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 2/2

¶19

and Mantu Kumar for the reason that the fathers of both the accused persons were witnesses in a case lodged against the husband and brother-in-law of the Informant.

¶20

Aforesaid Mantu Kumar has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32210 of 2021.

¶21

The petitioner does not have criminal antecedents.

¶22

Considering the aforenoted facts, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum – Exclusive- Special Court (POCSO) Act, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 140 of 2020 arising out of Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 388 of 2020.

¶23

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶24

rishi/-

¶25

U T

Pappu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md.Ajim Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjeet Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Baudha Singh @ Baudha Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Prasad Sah Vs the State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna, Bihar

Md. Imran Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Mithu Dome Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar