Allowed

Mahesh Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Feb 2022CR. MISC./32629/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to three petitioners charged with offences under the IPC and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court noted they were in custody, the charge sheet had been submitted, and no illicit liquor was recovered from their possession.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Mahesh Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh Vs The State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32629 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2020 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MAHESH SINGH @ MAHESH KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Brahmdev Singh Resident of Village - Mahua Singh Rai, P.S.- Mahua, District - Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 61154 of 2021

¶11

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2020 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali

¶12

======================================================

¶13

RAJA RAI @ RAJA KUMAR Son of Vinod Rai @ Vinod Ray Resident of Village - Kanhauli, P.S.- Mahua, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

with

¶20

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 62047 of 2021

¶21

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2020 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali

¶22

====================================================== DILEEP RAI @ DILEEP KUMAR Son of Diwakar Rai Resident of Village - Madhopur, P.S.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶27

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 32629 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur Ms.Vaishnavi Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 61154 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Sucheta Yadav (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 62047 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Upendra Kumar ======================================================

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32629 of 2021(3) dt.21-02-2022 2/4

¶29

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶30

3 21-02-2022

¶31

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶32

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, in all the three cases.

¶33

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with

¶34

Mahua Police Station Case No. 713 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a0/32(i)/34(ii)/38(ii)/41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶35

The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that the police, on receiving secret information that near the cow-shed of petitioner Raja Rai, the petitioners, namely, Mahesh Singh and Dileep Rai, and co-accused Arbind Singh, have brought a consignment of huge liquor in a truck and the same was being unloaded in different vehicles, proceeded towards the place of occurrence and upon seeing the police, the petitioners, namely, Mahesh Singh and Dileep Rai, and coaccused Arbind Singh, succeeded in fleeing away. However, they have been identified by the village chowkidar. The police recovered a total quantity of 2170.08 litres of illicit liquor from the truck and 1278 litres of illicit liquor from the pick-up van, standing near the place of occurrence.

¶36

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the

¶37

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32629 of 2021(3) dt.21-02-2022 3/4

¶38

petitioners have not committed any offence in the manner alleged and they have been falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of the disclosure of their names by the village chowkidar. They further submit that the petitioners are neither the owners of any of the vehicles nor the drivers and no illicit liquor has been recovered from their conscious possession and/or from the vehicles/premises belonging to them. Learned Counsel for the petitioner Raja Rai submits that the name of the petitioner has not been disclosed by the village chowkidar and he has been made accused in this case without any basis. They further submit that the petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 22.02.2021 and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are in custody since 12.07.2021. They further submit that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners and, as such, there is no apprehension of the petitioners being abscond and/or tamper with the evidence.

¶39

Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record and the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 22.02.2021 and 12.07.2021 respectively, no illicit liquor has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners, the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future due to

¶40

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32629 of 2021(3) dt.21-02-2022 4/4

¶41

pandemic and charge sheet has already been submitted, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners.

¶42

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶43

Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge -cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Vaishali, at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua Police Station Case No. 713 of 2020.

¶44

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Court, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶45

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶46

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶47

U √ T √

Mahesh Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shibu Chaupal Vs the State of Bihar

Vikky Kumar @ Vikky Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jitan Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Hirdev Singh @ Hardev Singh Vs the State of Bihar