Allowed

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Feb 2022CR. MISC./30920/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ for regular bail, the Patna High Court granted release to Santosh Kumar accused of drug trafficking and illicit liquor trade. The court noted the petitioner was not in possession of the contraband and allowed bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000/-. to the Special Judge, Excise, with two sureties.

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30920 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-446 Year-2020 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

====================================================== SANTOSH KUMAR @ SANTOSH SINGH S/O LATE SURENDRA KUNWAR @ SURENDRA SINGH R/O VILLAGE-BINODPUR, P.S.MUFFASIL (SINGHAUL O.P.), DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur Mr.Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶6

4 21-02-2022

¶7

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶8

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mufassil (Singhaul O.P.) Police Station Case No. 446 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a)/41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶9

The allegation, as per the First Information Report, is that the police intercepted one truck and recovered a total quantity of 1551.96 litres of illicit liquor from the same and the name of the petitioner, along with others, has transpired on the basis of information received by the police from its spy that the

¶10

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30920 of 2021(4) dt.21-02-2022 2/3

¶11

petitioner and others were indulged in the trade of illicit liquor.

¶12

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of the information received by the police from its spy. He further submits that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle in question. He further submits that no illicit liquor has been recovered from the conscious possession and/or vehicle/premises belonging to the petitioner. He next submits that similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Manohar Yadav, Bhagwan Bhagat and Ramadhar Singh, have been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.02.2021 and charge sheet has been submitted.

¶13

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that huge quantity of liquor has been recovered from the truck and the truck was also found to be a stolen one.

¶14

Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court and the petitioner

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30920 of 2021(4) dt.21-02-2022 3/3

¶16

is in custody since 17.02.2021, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶17

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶18

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Begusarai, in connection with Mufassil (Singhaul O.P.) Police Station Case No. 446 of 2020.

¶19

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Court, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶21

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶22

U √ T √

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shibu Chaupal Vs the State of Bihar

Vikky Kumar @ Vikky Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Jitan Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Hirdev Singh @ Hardev Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Mahesh Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar