Allowed

Sanjay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2022CR. MISC./32195/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner, Sanjay Mandal, in a theft and robbery case. Considering that no looted articles were recovered from him, similar co-accused had been granted bail, and the charge sheet was submitted, bail was granted with conditions regarding attendance and forfeiture default.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties of similar amount conditioned to attend trial.

Sanjay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32195 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2020 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY MANDAL Son of Ganesh Mandal @ Ganeshi Mandal Resident of Village- Simra, P.S.- Tekapatti, District- Purnia.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 17-02-2022 Heard Mr. Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for

¶12

the petitioner and Mr. Tapeshawar Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

¶14

Bihpur (Jhandapur) PS Case No. 185/2020 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the IPC, and subsequently, Section 395 IPC was added.

¶15

The allegation, as per First Information Report, is that some unknown thieves stolen the tractor of the informant while the informant after parking the same on the road side went to attend nature’s call.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently Section 395 of the IPC has been added on the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32195 of 2021(3) dt.17-02-2022 2/3

¶18

basis of re-statement of the informant recorded by the Investigating Officer in which he has changed earlier prosecution story by stating that unknown accused persons arrived on their Bolero vehicle and pulled the informant out from his tractor and kept him in the Bolero vehicle and fled away with the informant’s tractor. Learned counsel next submits that name of the petitioner transpired on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, Bikash Kumar made in Industrial Area PS Case No. 48/2020 and thereafter the petitioner has been made accused in other three cases also, including Industrial Area PS Case No. 48/2020. Learned counsel next submits that no looted article and/or incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody since 22.01.2021.

¶19

Learned counsel also submits that similarly situated co-accused persons Rahool Kumar Sah vide Cr. Misc. No. 33574/2021, Gautam Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No. 36417/2021, Sushil Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No. 43919/2021, Saurav Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No. 52496/2021, Vikash Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No.39222/2021 have been granted bail by this Court.

¶20

Regards being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32195 of 2021(3) dt.17-02-2022 3/3

¶22

the fact that no looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, he is in custody since 22.01.2021, the petitioner has not been put on TIP, charge-sheet has already been submitted and similarly situated co-accused persons, have been granted bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner subject to the condition that petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during course of trial and in case of default on two consecutive dates on the part of petitioner, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶23

Accordingly, let the petitioner, SANJAY MANDAL be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/(Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate1, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in connection with Bihpur (Jhandapur) PS Case No. 185/2020.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

perwez

¶26

U T

Sanjay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranvijay Rai @ Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Bharat Yadav @ Ram Barat Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Hare Ram Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Chand Vs The State of Bihar

Shibu Chaupal Vs the State of Bihar